Emily Tan
Aug 7, 2014

Scattered brand and business strategy hurting Suning

BRAND HEALTH CHECK: Retailer Suning, which built its brand on its chain of home-appliance stores, is struggling to build an online offering to match its powerful e-commerce competitors.

Suning's retail outlet in Tai Po Mall, Hong Kong
Suning's retail outlet in Tai Po Mall, Hong Kong

In the first half of 2014, Suning posted a loss of RMB749 million (US$121.4 million). This plunge is in stark contrast with the net profit of $119 million it reported for the same period in 2013. According to Inside Retail, the company has also shuttered 64 new stores this year, taking its footprint down to 1,583 in mainland China, 27 in Hong Kong and 13 in Japan.

An erratic online strategy that lacks clear vision has been a major part of Suning’s problem, according to Kevin Gentle, digital strategy director at Labbrand. “I’ve been watching them for a while, and so far they’ve launched an online bookstore for e-books, then they launched a travel platform to compete with Crtip, then they invested in PPTV and online video, then baby products… there’s just been no clear direction.”

Analysts have criticised Suning’s strategy as “too daring”, reported MarketWatch.

While it’s true that retailers need a presence in e-commerce, trying to move from a chain store brand to a technology company that hopes to compete with Alibaba and Tencent is too big of a leap, Gentle said. “They have a brand that’s rooted in physical retail, and they’re trying to build into categories where they have no brand equity," he said. "What’s even more troubling is that it was never a very strong brand, not one that inspired loyalty. Suning had all those shops and a large retail presence but no loyalty or a fanbase that would inspire consumers to follow them from offline to online.”

In its annual report ending December 2013, Suning blamed its same-price strategy at both its bricks-and-mortar and online stores for its 86.1 per cent year-over-year decline in net profit, reported the Nikkei Asian Review.

This strategy was in essence a price war with both online and other physical retailers (such as Gome), as the company not only offered lower prices online but also demanded that its physical stores drop prices to the same level, observed the Review.

“This price war with other online retailers killed their finances,” added Gentle.

What the brand should be focusing on instead, he said, is on building up its in-store experience and extending that experience online. “They should be digitising their retail environment," he said. "Developing apps, for example, that will allow consumers to download all the information they want on any appliance they see in-store, including the dimensions.”

 

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

13 minutes ago

Creative agency shake-up at WPP: Grey to move into ...

Grey will split from AKQA as part of the move.

16 hours ago

TBWA’s newly appointed chief AI officer on why 'AI ...

Campaign Asia speaks exclusively with Lucio Ribeiro and TBWA's Kimberlee Wells on their AI talent investment and how it will bridge the tech and creativity gap to drive sharper brand outcomes.

18 hours ago

Agency Report Cards 2024: We grade 25 APAC networks

The grades are in for Campaign Asia's 22nd annual evaluation of APAC agency networks. Subscribe to read our detailed analyses.

18 hours ago

40 Under 40 2025: Open for nominations

The 13th edition of 40 Under 40 will celebrate the brightest stars in APAC marketing and advertising firmament—the early bird deadline is June 9.