Michael O'Neill
May 10, 2010

Global media may be set to welcome China, but not the Chinese Government

Early last year, Chinese media companies became global news after the country's central Government said it would commit almost US$7 billion to push its state media overseas. Since then, however, things have been quiet.

China media
China media

The commitment was seen as part of the Government’s soft power push that would allow it to become part of the global news and cultural agenda, but without the usual negative stereotypes.

State-owned broadcaster CCTV continues to launch foreign-language channels but their reach and influence are limited. The same is true for the news agency Xinhua, which is expanding its overseas footprint but is still a small and not especially well-regarded player in the global news world.

The reasons for this lack of impact are obvious. Critics quite rightly see the hand of Government behind the what is after all a state-sanctioned policy. While a global CCTV channel may at best be of interest to the international Chinese diaspora, other news media consumers are going to turn to better and more objective sources. But if China is really looking to improve its image overseas, it would be advised to steer clear of the huge news organisations and instead tap into an even ‘softer’ way of realising this intention.

Away from the headlines, a more interesting overseas push is coming not from the big Government-run monoliths but the more agile - although by no means small - private digital media companies. Tencent’s buy into Russia’s Digital Sky Technologies is just the latest example of this trend.

Others, such as e-commerce giant Alibaba and the gaming company Shanda, have also made initial steps overseas. The success of these ventures has so far been minimal - if anything, their ventures abroad so far have been experimental, although Tencent’s buy into DST suggests it may now be progressing into a more mature stage of development.

So how can these companies succeed where the state-owned giants have so far failed?

Well, one answer is that despite in some instances operating in similar areas to the likes of CCTV and Xinhua (Tencent’s online video service for example) they are able to sidestep the propaganda tag. Digital media, unlike traditional news media, is seen as less threatening, even though its potential influence could in the future be even more pervasive.

For global markets - and consumers - Tencent and Shanda can expect to be treated in much the same way as any Chinese company looking to do business overseas. That is not to say that international sentiment will be any less suspicious - this is a cross that all Chinese companies seem fated to bear - but the digital media players should be able to avoid this more than most and become the true ambassadors for China’s soft power initiative.

Got a view?
Email michael.o’[email protected]

This article was originally published in the 6 May 2010 issue of Media.

Source:
Campaign China

Related Articles

Just Published

18 hours ago

The madness of US election advertising, where it's ...

The shift from a “craft” approach to a “factory” approach in political advertising is now complete, with ad-makers throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks, says Éric Blais in his latest Free to Disagree column

21 hours ago

Amazon ad revenue growth outpaced retail sales in Q3

CEO Andy Jassy noted sponsored product offering saw “meaningful” growth in the quarter due to increased ad relevance and optimization.

2 days ago

Indonesia bans iPhone 16 sales over lack of local ...

Marketing and sale of Apple's latest phones have been blocked in Indonesia after the tech giant failed to comply with regulations requiring 40% of smartphones to be made from local parts.

2 days ago

Is Publicis’ dismissal of staff for return-to-office...

Adland weighs in on where the flexible working debate is heading.