Jessica Goodfellow
Nov 21, 2019

Facebook adds whitelisting to brand safety suite; admits it will 'never be perfect'

The platform is rolling out more rigorous brand-safety controls in acknowledgement it will "never be perfect" at removing harmful content.

Facebook adds whitelisting to brand safety suite; admits it will 'never be perfect'

Facebook is testing stricter brand-safety controls including an option for advertisers to whitelist publishers and content types they want to appear alongside for instream video.

The social-media platform is testing "dynamic content sets" with a select group of advertisers that provides a content-level whitelisting tool for advertisers that are clients of ad-verification partners Integral Ad Science, OpenSlate, and Zefr. Zefr is a new brand-safety partner for Facebook. The tool, which is limited to in-stream placements, will allow advertisers to routinely adjust the kind of video content their brands appear next to.

Facebook is also testing publisher whitelists for Audience Network and in-stream ads, with a view to expanding the test more broadly next year.

Going forward, advertisers will be able to manage inventory filters, set up blocklists and receive delivery reports for entire accounts within Business Manager or Ads Manager, instead of having to apply controls one campaign at a time. The company is also improving its delivery reports to allow advertisers to search by account ID or publisher.

The platform announced the new controls Wednesday (20 November) as part of its ambition to "provide a safe environment for people and advertisers" and to give advertisers "more transparency and sophisticated tools to suit their brand".

"All of these policies and controls contribute to a quality ecosystem among people, publishers and advertisers," the company said in a blog post.

It acknowledged that the most effective way to ensure brand safety "is to prevent harmful content from ever appearing on our services in the first place", but added "we’ll never be perfect" in that regard.

"We continue to make investments in technology and people to limit as much as we can," the company said. 

The additional controls address advertiser concerns over brand safety, but the platform is still battling with government officials over its political advertising stance.

The platform has said it will not fact-check political advertising, meaning politicians are permitted to take out campaigns that spread lies and misinformation on the platform. It has argued the move promotes free speech, but it has drawn harsh criticism from industry observers and politicians. At the same time, Twitter and TikTok have banned all political advertising, and Snapchat has affirmed it fact-checks all political ads before they run.

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

5 hours ago

Spikes Asia 2025: Rika Komakine and Tetsuya Honda ...

A Japanese PR agency and their client cooked up a Spikes Asia Award-winning campaign by tackling a common cooking complaint—sticky gyoza. This is how they did it.

6 hours ago

Meta could soon be the largest misinformation ...

The tech company’s recent changes could result in a surge in unmoderated and unfortunate content, underscoring the need for advertisers to again be mindful about where they spend their dollars, writes Sarah Thompson.

7 hours ago

WPP mandates four days per week in office

The change to the global guidelines will apply across WPP's operations.

9 hours ago

Why Meta’s pivot on fact-checking is the right move

This course correction is not merely expedient; it’s the right move for Meta, its shareholders, advertisers, and audiences alike, argues Ramakrishnan Raja in his forthright analysis.