Jenny Chan 陳詠欣
Jan 5, 2012

Brands should brace themselves for the end of 'cheap China'

CHINA - The Chinese government's continued chase for economic development has challenged its longstanding 'cheap' label, a new study has found. It concludes that foreign brands operating in the mainland need to rethink their strategies - fast.

Brands should brace themselves for the end of 'cheap China'

The study, by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, shows higher manufacturing costs, shifting government policies and social issues are compounding the complexity of doing business in China.

"Right now, the value proposition for many firms in China is disappearing and eroding China's competitive low-cost advantage relative to other countries," Tom Wendt, author of the study, says.

Production prices in China are increasing faster than neighbouring Vietnam, according to IHS Global Insight and the OECD. The 2010-2015 period is expected to experience a 75 per cent hike in prices; and unlike every other country, China's prices did not decrease during the 2008 crisis.

Roland Berger research finds the growth of foreign tech firms may soon pass their tipping points in China as Wendt anticipates a decline in market share by 2023 for specific industries like computers, semiconductors, circuit boards, and LCD televisions.

Particularly, China will eclipse the US as the largest market for Intel in 2012, says Shaun Rein, author of his new book The End of Cheap China and founder cum managing director of the China Market Research Group. In fact, the mercury is also rising for Chinese tech brands. "Cisco is being killed by Huawei, Dell by Lenovo," Rein remarks.  

Rein points out that China’s manufacturing cycle actually beats that of the US because of "superior infrastructure and efficient labour pools".

The state's redevelopment plan for the Pearl River Delta (to be completed by 2020) includes phasing out non-core industries and bringing in promising sectors like advanced manufacturing (such as power equipment), hi-tech R&D, and modern service industries (such as financial services, information services, logistics, tourism).

The consultancy singles out Hewlett Packard, Cisco, Dell, Mattel, Esprit, Nike and Foxconn as the first major companies likely to be impacted by the changes, as they are focused on low value-add manufacturing and exporting.

China is no longer a cheap place to do business, and its shift away from being an export-oriented economy to one that is consumption-led causes tension for brands like Gap and Ralph Lauren, Rein says, noting that neither are handling their branding well in the region.

Ralph Lauren, for example, has not been catering to the taste of Chinese consumers with their "blue-eyed models" and not crafting its brand image to suit the local culture.

Not all firms are affected to the same extent though, as ballooning local demand can drive expansion for the automotive industry, Wendt concurs.

"The smart brands will be the ones who look at China as a market to sell into rather than a market to buy from," Rein adds, with Chinese consumers no longer viewed as price-sensitive as before.

Wendt also stresses that the window to react to the fundamentally changing Chinese business environment is closing quickly.

 

Source:
Campaign China

Related Articles

Just Published

18 minutes ago

Why the CMO role has not got easier

With the expansion of the customer journey, CMOs are being asked to do considerably more than before—creative, research, brand strategy, CRM, social, PR and even HR.

24 minutes ago

TikTok turns lights back on after assurances from ...

The Chinese-owned social platform went dark on Saturday night after months of debate with the Supreme Court.

2 days ago

Creative Minds: FCB's Claire Herselman transforms ...

Get to know the senior copywriter who moved to London at 18 and worked as a barista.

2 days ago

WPP boss Mark Read hits back at employee vitriol ...

CEO told Campaign's sister title, PRWeek, that some of the comments being made about his decision to require all employees to work in the office at least four days a week do not reflect the views of many staff.