Jenny Chan 陳詠欣
Feb 27, 2012

Michael Jordan sues Qiaodan Sports for improper use of name

BEIJING - A lawsuit has been filed against Qiaodan Sports Company alleging that it deliberately used Michael Jordan's name without his permission in order to mislead Chinese consumers.

Michael Jordan sues Qiaodan Sports for improper use of name

The basketball legend is taking action against the Chinese sportswear manufacturer to preserve the ownership of his personal brand, as 'Qiaodan' is the moniker Jordan has been known by since 1984, after he was seen on Chinese television for the first time as a member of the US Olympic team.

Local media publications such as the People’s Daily, Economic Daily and China Sports Daily have reported on Jordan’s basketball career in the past by referring to him as 'Qiaodan (乔丹)'.

"I've worked hard to establish my identity and brand, and I take tremendous pride in the shoes and apparel that feature my name and logo," Jordan said in a press release.
 
Apart from 'Qiaodan' (Chinese translation of 'Jordan'), the company has also applied to register trademarks containing the number 23 (Jordan's jersey number); as well as the Chinese characters and associated pinyin romanisation of Jeffrey and Marcus (Jordan’s sons).
 
Qiaodan Sports used these names in large-scale advertising campaigns, including sponsorships of the World University Games and Federation Internationale de Basketball Amateur from 2008 to 2010.
 
"We just use a Chinese translation of a common foreign family name and it cannot be identified with Michael Jordan," said to Hou Lidong, manager of the public relations department of Qiaodan Sports. 
 
Official Jordan merchandise like the Air Jordan is marketed in China by Nike, which registered the player's name in English in 1993. Qiaodan's logo resembles Nike’s 'Jumpman' logo, but Hou said " anyone can associate it with a basketball player, but in fact we think it can also be understood as an action of running."
 
Jordan stated that Chinese consumers "deserve to know what they are buying" and asserted that the complaint is not about money. "It's about protecting my name. Any monetary awards I might receive will be invested in growing the sport of basketball in China."

Under Chinese law, the plaintiff in a naming rights lawsuit is entitled to injunctive relief and damages if the defendant acts in bad faith by intentionally using the name or other personal attributes of a famous public figure without authorisation.

Another condition is when the usage damages the plaintiff by causing confusion among consumers who mistakenly associate the infringer with the plaintiff. The court will take around one week to decide whether to accept a lawsuit or not, which is typical practice in China.

Hou points out that in Qiaodan's advertising outreach, the company has been marketing itself as a national brand, though it "will not take the initiative to tell each and every customer", and the misleading relevance of Michael Jordan and the Chinese brand is "just the people's guess".

A dedicated website has been set up by JumpDC, Jordan's business office in the US, with information relating to this lawsuit and a video message from the man himself.

According to a statement posted on Qiaodan's website last night, ever since the business started using the 'Qiaodan' brand in June 2000, Michael Jordan has never raised an objection or been in contact with the company.

Speaking to local media in a Q&A interview, Hou again claimed there are no connections between its brand and Michael Jordan. "23 is just a number, like $23 or 230 dollars… There are many other celebrities both in the US and worldwide called Jordan.”

 

Source:
Campaign China

Related Articles

Just Published

9 hours ago

40 Under 40 2024: Mamaa Duker, VML

Notable achievements include leading VML through a momentous merger, helping to reel in big sales, and growing WPP’s ethnic and cultural diversity network by a mile.

10 hours ago

Will you let your children inherit a world without ...

A raw, unflinching look at the illegal wildlife trade, starring Ray Winstone, will force you to confront the horrifying truth... and act.

11 hours ago

Campaign CMO Outlook 2024: Why marketers still want ...

In the second part of the Outlook series, global marketers weigh in on Amazon Prime’s move into ad-tier streaming, how video-on-demand will reshape strategies, and where it's still falling short.

13 hours ago

Jaguar's identity crisis: A self-inflicted wound ...

Jaguar's baffling attempt at reinvention from feline grace to rock-based abstraction is a masterclass in brand self-sabotage, says Resonant's Ramakrishnan Raja—and it risks destroying the marque entirely.